What Could the Future of Work Look Like?

image: gapingvoid.com

What are the changing patterns of work? What are the shifts in perspective and attitude? What do the organization and worker of the future look like?

I’ve been mulling on these questions recently, and wanted to invite a dialogue about it. Below is a synthesis of ideas from a number of reports and articles (references at bottom of post) to get a sense of where we’re at in this narrative and where we might be headed.

From Job Security to Employability

The 20th century pattern of employment featured a steady, permanent job with predictably rising pay. In order to achieve maximum efficiency in that predominantly industrial paradigm, fully anticipated behavior was desirable — Meaning, people were viewed as cogs in a system: not necessarily paid to think, but paid to follow rules. They were designed to be interchangeable, and paid more for clock time than specific outcomes.

That model includes characteristics like:

  • full-time exclusive employment relationship
  • paid for amount of time spent at work
  • common location
  • stable hierarchies
  • evaluation primarily through the judgment of superiors
  • what and how the job is done is prescribed

A sense of security and safety came from the organization, knowing that hard work, loyalty and dedication were a good formula to get you into a lifetime job with regular pay raises, promotions and a good pension at retirement.

In the 21st century pattern, it’s accepted that we’ll have many careers over our lifetime, that movement may be lateral or transitional instead of just linear, and that “job security” will have to come through the individual. We’ll have to take more responsibility for our careers and the direction of our lives through self-awareness and assessment of our strengths and weaknesses, continuous learning, self-improvement, and the ability to be flexible and adaptive to change.

Some characteristics include:

  • part-time, flextime, crowdsourced, project-based swarm teams, free agents
  • paid to harvest new ideas and tap into community knowledge
  • working from home & participating in virtual enterprises
  • flattening hierarchies
  • peer evaluation, external evaluation, new metrics like reputation, degree of connectedness, and influence in a network
  • employees participate in informal communities of practice, work and learning

From Work/Life “Balance” to Work/Life Integration

Work, life, and play used to be more clearly demarcated, and we’d try to “balance” these various identities. Now the edges are blurring and overlapping. We’re trying to close the gap so that “who we are” and “what we do” aren’t different things. We’re rediscovering the need to feel that what we do matters, provides meaning and purpose, and makes us feel that we’re a part of something bigger than ourselves.

Instead of balance, we’re looking for an integration where work can become a reflection of a certain way of life, and also a vehicle for satisfying our personal and social motivations.

The Courtship Between Worker & Organization

The interplay between 21st century workers and organizations is a matchmaking dance, where both parties seek to find an alignment of vision and values.

Firms want a talented workforce whose members passionately buy into the vision. Workers want to be inspired to contribute their best to an organization with clarity of mission and purpose.

Firms want to empower and create value for the employee, so the employee will be motivated to interact with customers. Workers want to feel a sense of ownership and control in how they structure their work, and an environment where knowledge and decision-making is decentralized.

Firms want leaders with an entrepreneurial mindset that can leverage new business models. Workers of tomorrow want to be able to cultivate certain dispositions and skill sets are not necessarily prized in conventional work environments, and the support of a management team that can play the role of coach and facilitator.

Both sides of this equation seem to value personal accountability, growth, learning, and continuous improvement. Both seem to be looking for a people-centric approach.

So How Do We Create this Holistic Human Workforce?

I wonder what the dialogue might sound like to kick off this future-shaping.

The organization might say:

“Ok, look. Things are moving fast these days and constantly changing, and our challenges are complex. We need totally rethink our approach to business and transform the marketplace. We need to figure out how to add value for customers that’s totally differentiable, compelling and urgent. We need to question the very nature of the organization and how it’s managed. And we need a stellar team of people who can make this happen — people with courage and imagination.

Please drop your sense of entitlement — we can’t guarantee you lifelong employment. In fact, we don’t even know if we’ll be here tomorrow. We’re moving forward into a shape and location that we’ve never been, so we need people with vision who can take responsibility for the future. The territory we’re entering doesn’t have regimented work processes and things will not be clear-cut, so hopefully you’re comfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity.

Accept total responsibility for your outcomes. That includes managing your own learning, skills development and career management. Be creative, be resourceful, take initiative, throw obsolete beliefs out the door, and be completely receptive to new ideas. Let’s go.”

The worker response might be something like:

“Alright. I’m willing to adopt a self-employed attitude, and assume I’m working with (not for) you. I’ll embrace the fact that we’re living in a networked world, that digital technologies allow for rapid information sharing and communication, and that innovation happens when many of us can interact efficiently across these mediums. I’ll work on my emotional intelligence and ability to communicate and manage conflict. I’ll invest in myself and make a commitment to continuous learning, and seek new knowledge by participating in a community of practice. I’ll face my fears and start the process of changing myself, and value enhancement as well as advancement.  I’ll bring my full Self to the table, and I’ll keep upgrading – my attitude, my craftsmanship, my performance. Support me in that.”

So if we pretend that these are the types of forward-focused mindsets that are defining the future of work, what might the next round of questions be?

I wonder:

What if we treated business itself as a platform to support personal and social learning?

How can we create nurturing, immersive environments for workers to satisfy their dispositions and talents?

What dispositions do we want to cultivate?

How can we develop a structure for lifelong learning, mentorship and development?

How can we create motivational feedback loops to improve personal performance and modify behavior?

How can we create working environments that increase human freedom and agency to make decisions and be self-directed?

What else should we be asking as we move forward?

references and further exploring:

The Future of Work by David Bollier (PDF)
The Future of Work by Thomas Malone
The Future of Workplaces by GigaOm
The Workplace of the Future: alabamaconnection.org
10 Forces Shaping the Workplace of the Future
The 10 Keys to Building the Flexible Workplace of the Future
12 Rules for Self Management

books of interest:

We Are All Self-Employed by Cliff Hakim
Gung Ho! by Ken Blanchard & Sheldon Bowles
Seven Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen Covey
First Things First by Stephen Covey
How to Find the Work You Love by Lawrence Boldt
Zen & The Art of Making a Living by Lawrence Boldt
Do What You Love The Money Will Follow by Marsha Sinetar
What Color is Your Parachute? by Richard Bolles
Making Vocational Choices by John Holland
Applied Concepts of Life Planning by Vernon Zunker
On Becoming a Leader by Warren Bennis
Flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
The Third Wave by Alvin Toffler
Future Shock by Alvin Toffler
Megatrends by John Naisbitt
Future Tense by Ian Morrison & Greg Schmid
New Work Habits for a Radically Changing World by Price Pritchett

venessa miemis

(256 posts)

  • http://twitter.com/KnowNOW_Knowhow marianne doczi

    Hi Venessa, I think one of the most interesting issues is the role of government. I say this because I’ve had a past life as a public servant in New Zealand in the (un) employment service and in labour market analysis. There needs to be innovative thinking done about how a government would use taxes to support workers affected by the increasing fragmentation of the labour market. Unemployment benefit or insurance is seen as a short term need inbetween lengthy periods of employment. A fragmented employment model might mean that people need shorter periods of assistance but more frequently. Just as government provided income support or social welfare essentially subsidises low wages, unemployment benefits would need to support fragile labour market attachment.

    Another issue is that many industries are still evolving their business models as they either face disintermediation because of the internet or are in the beginning phases of their creation (many digitally based enterprises) and the business model (i.e., how they actually make any money) is not clear. This affects both job security and remuneration. the worker or organisation of the future can’t be seen in isolation from the business model/s of the future.

    My last issue is that so few enterprises have the culture or skills to have the sorts of conversations that are needed.

    Actually, a last issue, is that the rise of collaboration might see a 21st century reframing of cooperatives, which could provide more flexibility and a culture that made it more possible to discuss the issues you raise.

  • http://twitter.com/residualreach Marni Melrose

    Hi Venessa,

    Thanks for your thought provoking post. I’ll definitely be reading some of the linked articles and books above.

    I noticed in your list, Steven Covey’s book “First things First”. It’s one of the key ingredients to the systems that I design. I’ve been championing work/life integration for the past 10 years with the small business clients that I have served. What I did was put mechanisms inside of their business systems so that they could see both their life and their work. Still it was hard to do with the structure of older business software. It wasn’t as fluid as I’d like it to be.

    Recently I started working with a new cloud based online work platform that has allowed us to more fully integrate life and business into the systems we design with style and ease.

    These new working environments (aka online work platforms) that you speak of will definitely change the way people work, tearing down so many barriers to collaboration.

    One example is, in the past it has been, “Well our systems support PCs or our systems support Macs, etc.” with the cloud that issue is a non-issue, allowing people to work on the OS of their choosing with the devices of their choosing.

    Another example is how we have been able to create client workspaces on this new platform so that we can bring our clients right into our workflow. Now we don’t have to do any reporting, since they can see the part of the workflow that pertains to them in realtime. Also we can assign them tasks and we are informed immediately when they’ve completed those tasks. The speed of moving projects forward has increased, I’d say, more than 60% from this one change alone.

    The social media style status updates keep everyone informed and up to date on the current developments as well as providing a history of changes. It’s a whole new world of work and I am excited to be here at this point in history.

    • http://twitter.com/VenessaMiemis Venessa Miemis

      thanks for this, Marni! i’m curious about this line – “What I did was put mechanisms inside of their business systems so that they could see both their life and their work.” can you say more?

  • http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/ Sepp_Hasslberger

    It would seem that the most sensible change we could make, seeing the trend towards less and less availability of “secure” jobs, would be to support those who are supposed to do the work as marianne doczi says.

    I would even go further than that. We need to figure out a way to de-couple work from obtaining the means for survival.

    When your basics are covered, regardless of having a job or not, you can then choose what kind of work you’d like to do, and you will not have to accept the first offer that comes along, just because the alternative is starvation or at least poverty.

    What I am saying is that in a working world that is properly arranged, everyone should have their basics covered – as a basic right. After that, creativity can flourish freely, and work can be a serious contract, a contract made between equal parties.

    As it is today, every job, every position offered is practically an offer people can’t refuse. You work at OUR conditions or you don’t work. We can find someone else in a blink of the eye.

    When basics are covered, you work if you like the offer. You’re not forced to accept. Balance ensues, and with it comes greatly increased productivity. Because it pays.

    • http://twitter.com/VenessaMiemis Venessa Miemis

      hey Sepp, conceptually i like this.

      how would you suggest going about having basic needs covered? you know i’ve thought a lot about resilient cities and have looked at the work you and others are doing to create local currency models and p2p sharing structures to help accomplish this type of thing. where can we look (or create) a demonstrate site that shows how this actually would work?

      • http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/ Sepp_Hasslberger

        Hi Venessa, I missed this reply at the time.
        my first option for having basic needs covered would be a general basic income, but this implies control over the money system, and ability to modify it substantially. I haven’t figured out how to get around that obstacle.
        Perhaps it could also be done with a widely used alt money system that has demurrage incorporated, and that uses a re-distribution of the money demurrage brings in to make a de facto basic income.
        Perhaps the easiest thing to start though is to create (or stimulate the creation of) communities that share, creating resilience and covering basic needs through community action.
        It’s still open … although time is ticking.

  • http://twitter.com/petervan Peter Vander Auwera

    Hi Venessa ! I just tweeted http://newunionism.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/olsen/ and an associated (1hour) video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCiVO4fGbl8&feature=youtu.be (feels a bit weird, and you need to be present when you listen to Rune Kvist Olsen) which at least for me blow me away in rethinking leadership into leadingship. It cuts deep in what motivates people. There is also an associated slide deck here http://goo.gl/Ds1Qd

    Rune challenges big time all our preconceptions about leaders and followers. I feel deeply inspired by it.

    Let me know what you think

    Warm regards

    Petervan

  • http://www.postlinearity.com gregorylent

    now is the time for understanding consciousness, awareness, intention, multi-dimensionality, the power of creating reality …

    because addressed via linear thinking, no matter how insightful, the challenges alluded to in this post are unsolvable.

    a paradigm shift having different rules for cause and effect is not comprehensible to the former reality.

    short solution, meditate, open awareness, understand heart … that opens some doors.

  • disqus_yP2K6z0IsX

  • http://www.facebook.com/frankspencer Frank W. Spencer IV

    Hi Venessa,

    Much of your excellent post sounds like our keynote on the future of work and talent. We identified 5 emerging patterns around work and talent composed of multiple converging trends and issues, including areas such as holistic lifestyles, postnormal identities, and entrepreneurial models (even within companies). You allude to 2 things that I would highlight: hiring for “hackability” and utilizing the “collaborative consumption” concept for talent. The first is not only about having people “hack” our organizations for flaws and weaknesses that we would otherwise miss due to group think, but also speaks to hiring for ability to “learn, unlearn, and relearn” as opposed to hiring for a specific job description. Organizational needs are changing so rapidly that the jobs that we are hired for may be obsolete by the time get the hang of it, and this increases the value of those individuals who can “hack” their way into any situation or need. The second idea has to do with applying the sharing model to the workforce and talent, much like bike or car sharing within cities. Today’s work environment and the expectations of a new workforce means that people will be working for multiple employers simultaneously, not exclusively. Organizations must reframe to not only make room for this collaborative workforce, but leverage the power of that open-sharing environment where knowledge connections increase the value of the entrepreneurial mindset. These 2 concepts alone point to a much more flexible, adaptive, resilient, and transformative future of work.

    Best,

    Frank Spencer

    Principal

    Kedge

    • http://twitter.com/VenessaMiemis Venessa Miemis

      Frank, keynote sounds fascinating. is it recorded/posted anywhere?

      i’m curious if you can unpack more your second idea about a collaborative consumption sharing model. what do you mean by that? can you give me some examples?

  • Jody Woodland

    Tom Peters has also written about this subject, addressing the concepts of “firing yourself” in the Brand You 50 and of “every team as a professional services firm” in the Professional Services Firm 50. Some good ideas, if you can get by the breathless tone.

  • John Kellden

    What are the minimal requirements we need to play well?

    *A loosely coupled glocal network of guilds*

    My guess is we need guilds. These guilds needs to be talking with each
    other. Local currency guilds, local production guilds, neighborhood
    community guilds. Here, I define a guild as part community and part
    governance structure. If intelligently designed, they would be able to
    work alongside with existing power structures, yet also prepare
    contingency scenarios if and when the old narratives, the trust in the
    old structures, implodes.

    *Future of Work is a fragmented, fracturing field. This is a good thing*
    The tension between “groups”
    different vmemes in the dynamics, can be reframed as creative tension.
    We would benefit enormously from letting go of the desire to base
    everything on one overarching monolithic “truth”. Data needs to be
    rekindled, restoried, renarrated.

    *Task as the generative unit*

    One idea I have is to let go of the concepts of “job” and “work” and
    instead base a new economy of the concept of “task”. Everyone on the
    planet is perfectly capable of doing one task at a time. We already have
    all the social platforms at our disposal, to coordinate tasks. If we
    build structures around tasks worth doing, these structures will serve
    us, rather than us serving existing structures.

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/120497731371323/permalink/369210316500062/

    *Guilds* via Michel Bauwens
    http://p2pfoundation.net/Guilds

    A core set of principles and characteristics, towards a structure that guides, enables and serves:
    (1) an “appropriability structure” that makes it profitable for individual entities to develop new technologies and sometimes share them;
    (2) reliance on group norms, as opposed to formal legal enactments, as an enforcement mechanism; and
    (3)
    a balance of competition and cooperation which determines what
    information is to be shared with the group, and what (if any)
    individual-proprietary information is not.

  • Pingback: From "unemployed" to unworking | Miles Hingston

  • http://twitter.com/Seabreezes1 Karen FavazzaSpencer

    Ahh… but the crux of the change is in that last little sentence from the employee to the employer, “Support me in that.” Creating that environment is challenging. It takes more than just saying the words, especially with a cultural predisposition to hierarchal structure, aka “command and control.” For me, the bottom line is the Working Environments – the physical, psychological and procedural set up sets up the game board, and the employees are bound by those parameters, regardless of what words are spoken.