Tags
Thanks to all of you that have been exploring the social web with me over the past few months via this blog and on Twitter. We’ve done a lot of thinking about what Twitter is, how to use it effectively, whether there’s a decent way to measure social media ROI, and debating the merits of this medium as a credible source for information at all. It’s time to take theory to practice.
My 2010 experiment is to do a 6 month case study to really see what measurable results can be gotten from utilizing online channels. I’m taking a three-prong approach: a blog, Ning & Twitter. I haven’t had time to really explore Facebook or Linkedin or other networks, so instead of spreading my effort too thin, I’m sticking with the 3.
Rationale:
- A blog serves as an anchor point for you to share your knowledge or expertise and establish your personal or professional brand
- Ning is a platform for building your own niche social network. (Someone has already done the work of building a Ning site for our city, so I’m just going to continue being active there.)
- Twitter is… well, I’ve reflected on what Twitter is here and here. Twitter is whatever you want it to be. From a business perspective, it’s a communications platform for developing relationships with colleagues and potential clients, and for distributing the content from your blog.
Problem being addressed:
A few years ago, I was getting ready to buy my first house, and decided to get a real estate license so I’d know what they know. What I found was an industry operating in an outdated model with virtually no means for public accountability, making it a breeding ground for greedy, dishonest shysters. (subprime mortgage crisis, anyone?) Fast forward a few years, and the real estate industry is still ripe for an overhaul.
Opportunity Identified:
My first attempt at real estate mostly ended in frustration and helplessness. Now, I’m more comfortable with blogging, connecting with people, and doing basic design work with Adobe tools (Photoshop, Illustrator, etc). I’ve also been intensely studying and researching social technology, and am convinced it offers an unprecedented opportunity to facilitate change.
Here’s the plan, a la John Fergurson’s ‘Marketing Strategy vs. Tactics‘ post on Brand Insight blog.
Goal: Ultimately, to disrupt the industry.
Strategy: To build a better model, built on accountability, trust, transparency, and equity.
Tactics: Change doesn’t happen overnight. As Clay Shirky put it in his book Here Comes Everybody: ‘Revolution doesn’t happen when society adopts new technology, it happens when society adopts new behaviors.’ I think the tools are in place for building new models, but we need to collectively agree to do so.
- Step 1: Build the brand.
This is going to start with a blog. I spent a few hours thinking about domain names. At first I tried for something really obvious and location specific (www.beaconrealestate.com, http://www.beaconhomes.com) but those were all taken. Then I decided those are boring and unoriginal anyway, and was better off with a name a bit more scalable. I kept in mind that a logo would help establish the brand and make it memorable, so tried to think of names that also lent themselves well to logo development. I thought about names for animal homes, because animals are cute and fun to draw, so would work for a logo. After going through about 30 potential names that were all taken, I came up with www.roostchooser.com. I bought the domain and registered the Twitter handle @roostchooser. Then I sketched a few different ideas, and came up with this:
OK, I’m no professional graphic designer, but I asked my 4 year old niece what she saw and she said “An owl and a house.” Done. Owls are both cute and wise, so I liked the inference –> if you utilize the blog, you are too! đ
- Step 2: Provide valuable and timely information.
I’m spending the next few days writing a few “pillar posts” – articles that are instructional, informative, and timeless. These are essential for positioning the blog as a resource, and laying a foundation for building trust and displaying transparency. I want the blog to be a combination of these types of posts:
- pillar posts
- local & industry news – market trends, average selling prices in the area, major commercial developments in the area that might affect home prices, etc
- home tips – practical money-saving tips for homeowners (switching to compact fluorescent bulbs, insulating the attic floor), where to find bargains on home renovation materials, available state tax credits, & any information that will make a home more efficient or beautiful
- Step 3: Be Human.
This pointer is ridiculed by some as “social media fluff,” but apparently it’s not an obvious component in a business model. Under the human umbrella you’ll find phrases like “engaging your audience,” “building relationships,” and “listening instead of broadcasting.” I’m a real person, and I’m doing this because of an idea: the current system is unfair. I’d like to help people by providing information that is usually hidden behind the curtain. In exchange, I’d hope people would choose to work with our team, and eventually to choose to participate in a new system altogether. The ‘human side’ will manifest from the tone of the posts, the discussions that form within the comments section of blog posts, the exchanges on Twitter, and one-on-one contact via email.
- Step 4: Expose liars, cheats, and frauds.
There are genuinely wonderful people in the industry who actually try to help others. Unfortunately, there are just as many scoundrels who ruin it for everyone else, and have gotten away with it for years because there hasn’t been a way to hold them accountable. This isn’t realtor specific – it’s an industry disease – real estate agents, attorneys, appraisers, mortgage brokers, inspectors, and anyone else who might be able to take a bite out of the commission pie are afflicted. If a forum was available for people to vent their frustrations and share their stories, perhaps industry business ethics would be a bit different.
Conclusion:
And that’s it.
The idea is to highlight the problem and spark a conversation of how to change it. If a critical mass of people agree to sidestep the system, we can begin to construct something new. There are already companies emerging who offer alternate models, like Redfin. The “ideal” situation might be a fully automated system between buyer and seller where each walks away feeling good, and neither has their pocketbook gouged. In the meantime, knowledgeable agents guiding people through the process are necessary, and deserve to be paid for their services. At the same time, if industry standards and transparency were raised, many unethical players would be bumped out of the game, leaving honest people with integrity to reinvent the system so everyone wins.
Our Western culture is in transition, are we’re just on the front end of realizing that business doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game. Perhaps my idea of transforming an industry is a lofty goal, but accomplishing it is more feasible than ever. We now have the social technology tools to communicate and connect outside of the established system; the next step is facilitating a new social agreement in how we choose to do business.
There are still limitations, foremost being digital media literacy – the ability to effectively navigate online spaces, filter information, and tap into the power of social networks. Those without internet access are at a disadvantage. Those fully immersed are still in the process of figuring it out.
So, the social web is still the Wild West. It’s polluted with marketing and spam, and clear examples of how it could be used to truly benefit humanity are murky at best. But I’m not discouraged. If we aim high and fall short, we’ll still be further along than if we accept the current norm. Let’s make 2010 the year of The Shakeup.
Venessa dear,
Respectfully…
1) The accurate response to Shirkyâs âHere Comes Everybody,â is âso when do they all go home.â NO ONE wants to live at the arena except maybe bums and fanatics.
2) Not really getting how youâre fundamentally changing the business other than trying to put a WOM-based practice online. So is EVERY RE agent and their brother presently.
3) The âbe human stuffâ is Web2 horseshit. MONEY ainât human. Both buyer and sell want a better deal⌠not a date. Sure, human touch may get their business but thatâs another business altogether.
4) Re: âexposing liars and cheatsâ: you cannot be both cop and sellerâs agent. Thatâs why we have an independent media.
5) You are confusing âzero sumâ and âtransactional.â Bottom line: transactions are the bottom line.
6) Re: âThe Shakeupâ: How âbout we learn how the system works first before we go f#$king with all those shinny buttons.
Kind regards,
@AmandaChapel
Thanks for the feedback @AmandaChapel,
re: #2. It wouldn’t start as a fundamental change to the business until enough people hop on board, but that’s the goal. Generally it seems questionable whether 5-7% commission rates are “fair.” I’m interested to see if there’s a better way.
re: #3. I actually thought of you when I wrote that point, so I’m not surprised to be under fire about it. Many of the people I’ve done business with are very human, and vulnerable, and looking for someone to help them. OF COURSE they want a better deal too. Many sellers are completely unrealistic in their expectations about the market price of their home, and many buyers will look a fabulous deal in the face and say ‘will they take $10,000 less?’. Fine, each party wants a better deal. If there weren’t so many fees involved with the transaction, maybe there would be more wiggle room for negotiating. And maybe if both parties were better informed about current trends of what the market will bear, they could walk away from a transaction feeling that they’d been dealt with fairly.
re: #4. There is no whistleblowing independent media source that I’m aware of in our area. I don’t even want to be the one to say anything. I’d rather provide a public forum where people can share their own personal experiences. And when enough eyeballs are looking at it, suddenly it matters.
re: #5. Sure, transactions are the bottom line, but how often does everyone involved walk away feeling fuzzy? The sellers would like to have gotten more and often feel like they overpaid in fees (though they say the buyer ‘actually’ is the one paying the fees, since without a buyer, there is no deal, but i guess it’s how you look at it), the buyer often does what the industry says (again, mortgage crisis…. people were tricked into believing it’s a sound decision to buy a house with $0 down, no savings, and a part-time job.), and the industry walks away laughing. I’m not saying this is the way it always works, but it’s the way it works sometimes, and it makes me sick.
re: #6. Exactly. First pillar post: “How the real estate industry really works”
Hi Venessa,
I think you are doing an amazing job/experiment and I can’t wait to see the impact you will have on the market.
The real estate market is indeed a sort of mystery or let me put it this way, the real estate business is the only one profiting because of the information asymmetry. I don’t live in the US (born in Aruba, lived in the Netherlands and now back in Aruba) but both in the Netherlands and in Aruba the real estate business is also very vague. The core characteristics of Social media (collaboration, open-source, reciprocity etc..) can change all that. Thanks to Social Media I can also follow what will happen (kind of a social media real life series).
Hi Nadia,
Thanks! I wish we would have “met” sooner – my husband and I just were in Aruba over the summer on a belated honeymoon. Walking through the sand dunes by the lighthouse was like being in a movie, so beautiful!
You’re wise to “ride” an established Ning network. I’ve seen several folks try to set up their own niche network on Ning, and it takes a long time–if ever–to gain a sufficient scale, reach and complexity (got to be enough “chaos” for new focus points to attract enough attention). Most that I’ve seen do not make it. And your experience there should be roughly parallel to the FaceBook platform, in terms of a “soft-gated” community environment. In some ways the stronger local bias of the site should be more helpful to your business, although your blog may be able to attract folks relocating to your market.
I don’t have the references any more, but real estate was an early success story on Twitter–there was at least one mainstream news article on this. [Oops just googled Real Estate and Twitter–and there’s a bunch out there].
Looking forward to following your results!
Thanks Ken.
It definitely takes time to hit that tipping point with Ning. I helped build the site in our city, and I just started a Ning community for New School students last semester… it has around 70 members, but I don’t think they know what to “do” yet. I need to get at least 5-10 students who will post regularly, whether it be a blog post, a comment in the forum, uploading some of their design work, etc, so that others catch on and follow suit. I was really invested in this blog and meeting people that that site got put on the back burner. But I think it’ll take off in 2010, mostly because there’s a niche to be filled. The students have no way to communicate with each other, and the students stick within their own schools (we have 8 schools – Parsons Design school, New School for Social Research, Milano NS for Mgmt and Urban Policy, etc). I think it would make sense for our relationships as students to be as interdisciplinary as the content that’s being taught within the schools.
As far as the real estate, I wonder if enough agents would buy into the system to start using it as an alternate to MLS listings, and start offering a better commission structure. Either it’ll work, or they’ll chase me out of town, lol.
@AmandaChapel – I love you, Amanda Chapel. You’re one of the first people I followed on Twitter. And you are probably the smartest, sassiest troll on the web – but you are a troll nonetheless.
Venessa – I like this post. ‘Human’ in terms of the Real Estate market (they’re rent-seeking value-suckers in the UK too) could simply mean ‘more accountable’. Estate Agents hide behind their codes of practice to avoid moral censure and their weasel ways are simply a part of their ‘culture’.
And ‘zero sum’ is an accurate description of Real Estate agents too. (Incidentally, Amanda, dearest, honey, pudding, ‘transactional’ and ‘zero sum’ aren’t mutually exclusive terms.) Buying a house is stressful and Real Estate agents can add value. But they seem to work on a model of playing buyer off against seller (the zero sum part) and there must be a way of working out how to isolate the socially (and financially) valuable part of what they do. Good for you for trying.
Most of Amanda Chapel’s Tweets make me snigger. Like I say, I love her dearly. But occasionally, she loses it. This is when she starts asking those bitter, “How about you launch a cross-media platform marketing campaign in all world markets simultaneously before you start talking about yourself as a marketing 2.0 expert?” rhetorical questions.
It’s your life. Learn first then do it. Learn by doing. I really don’t see as it makes any difference to anybody but you. It’s fair enough for Amanda Chapel to set about the gurus with her barbs. Heaven knows, some of them need it. But I don’t think you do – not yet anyway.
Last thing: I’m doing something similar this year – similarly harmless, probably a bit naive, see you on the other side. People keep telling me you can’t just do the 3-prong approach. If you do one, you have to do them all. (It’s a network thing?) I don’t know about that, but if you use Tweetdeck or one of the other clients, you can integrate LinkedIn and Twitter fairly easily. It’s not necessarily any extra work – and I’d imagine your customers are more likely to be there than Twitter.
Hey Simon,
Yeah, AC keeps me on my toes. đ But I hope I don’t get attacked for being a self-proclaimed ‘guru’, because I have never and will never say that. ‘Social media expert’ is overused to the point of being meaningless, and to waste the potential of this platform for marketing is sad.
I guess I could integrate LinkedIn w Twitter, but I don’t really want to tie myself into it. My goal isn’t to be a real estate agent, it’s to create a better platform for them to use. I’ll do a transaction here and there for people I know or via referral (being an unemployed grad student, every little bit of side money helps!), but my interests are broader than that. You’re right though, I have to think about where the people are looking and establish a presence there.
What’s your project?
Pingback: Als ik een makelaar zou zijn…. « Guido’s Blog
It sounds like a good project Venessa – good luck with it!
I still think it will be worthwhile to give some thought to metrics – how will you know if it works? etc.
Hi Tim,
I guess the initial metrics will be increased sales for the real estate agency with which I’m affiliated. But if it truly takes off, I will probably have to hire some back-end programmers to build it into what I’m imagining. The nice thing about this city is it’s small (around 16,000 people, I think), so spreading the word isn’t all that hard. But, I’ll have a lot of questions to ask myself, and be able to answer, before that happens… Like, why use this site instead of a FSBO site (for sale by owner) or craigslist or trulia or zillow? If the site is to be interpreted as a place where you can get solid information and interact with trustworthy individuals within the industry, who’s going to be making that decision? me? lots of things to consider.
someone told me that i need to patent this or something, so someone else doesn’t steal the idea. i thought that was kind of funny – there are no shortage of ideas out there, and plenty of people have them but never take action, because action requires work. if someone DOES steal the idea and runs with it, i’m ok with that. i’ll just start working on the next project. i guess i have the mind of an artist.. my passions for ideas but not monetization will keep me a pauper. ah well!
It’s not patentable anyway! And I fully agree with you about the value of action v. the value of an idea. If you make it work, it will be great. And if it does, there are plenty of ways to monetize it – no need to be a pauper (and anyway, if you’re poor how will you get more books??).
Pingback: What Can Educators Learn? | All Hands on Deck