• about
  • projects
    • Beach Loft Interior Design
    • Contact Conference
    • Emerging Leader Labs
    • Junto
    • Open Foresight
    • The Future of Money
      • future of money, cont.
    • The Future of Facebook

emergent by design

Category Archives: Uncategorized

What Could the Future of Money Look Like?

09 Tuesday Mar 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 135 Comments

Tags

commerce

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

We’ve been having a robust discussion around the idea of social capital over the past few days, and as the thread now contains over 100 great, thorough comments, I just want to create the opportunity to keep the thoughts flowing. For anyone just jumping in, if you’d like to get the background context, grab a coffee and read through Social Capital is not the same as Whuffie. If you’re short on time, here’s a brief summary:

Social capital is a term to describe the embedded value within a network. Some can be misled to assume it has a direct exchange-value because of our current association with what “capital” means. In fact, it cannot be the property of a single individual, but rather the property of a network, a commons, or a community – however you’d like to think of it. So what is it? Think of it as the foundation upon which a healthy, collaborative society is built. It’s comprised of trust, connectedness, interdependence, reciprocity, and social norms. (For instance, If you think of the current lack of trust society has in our financial institutions, you’ll see the correlation with the stability of our economic system.) Individuals contribute to the strength and depth of a society’s social capital through their actions and behaviors, but cannot individually possess it.

So if we hit the reset button, wipe away our assumptions, and think about a truly new economy – what is the mechanism for us to exchange value? Continue reading →

Social Capital is not the same as Whuffie

06 Saturday Mar 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 153 Comments

Tags

social organization

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

I recently read a post by Brian Solis titled Social Capital: The Currency of the Social Economy, which served as the catalyst for one of the most entertaining Twitter conversations I’ve had so far. I personally had a problem with the way the term “social capital” was used in the piece, which was inspired by the definition given to it by Tara Hunt in The Whuffie Factor. The reason I had a problem was that “social capital” already exists as a sociological concept that’s been in development for many years, and to now boil it down to an equivalent to “reputation” didn’t seem appropriate. And so I tweeted the sentiment. A lively discussion ensued with all kinds of people chiming in, including Brian Solis and Tara Hunt themselves. (Even Umair Haque from the Harvard Business Review made a cameo appearance. fun!) Continue reading →

Why do you share?

04 Thursday Mar 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 11 Comments

Tags

culture

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Over the past few weeks, we’ve been building out the idea of how to facilitate innovation within organizations. My proposal includes a revealing of the social network structure of an organization, breaking down silos between departments, sharing knowledge and information, and amplifying people’s natural strengths and talents.

I’ve been thinking about the sharing aspect the past few days, and why it shouldn’t be so hard to create an environment that encourages it.

As is usually the case, the topics I’m focused on suddenly appear all around me and bring me new perspectives and insights. In the past few days, there’s been a new meme – the Social Learning Snake Oil Salesman. The first post I noticed, Social snake oil, came from Harold Jarche, a practitioner in creating collaborative learning environments in the enterprise. He talked about how the field of Knowledge Management was “hijacked” by software vendors trying to sell it as an IT solution, and social learning is on the path to the same fate.

As soon as the software vendors and marketers get hold of a good idea, they pretty well destroy it.

Now social learning is being picked up by software vendors and marketers as the next solution-in-a-box, when it’s more of an approach and a cultural mind-set.

Since then, I’ve seen several others within the field echoing these sentiments, leading me to think about this a little more deeply.

[As a quick aside, here are a few people worth checking out if the concept of social or informal learning is new:

Harold Jarche – Learning and working on the web (@hjarche)

Jay Cross – Internet Time Wiki (@jaycross)

Jane Hart – Social Media in Learning & Center for Learning & Performance Technologies (@c4lpt)

Jon Husband – Wirearchy (@jonhusband)

Dave Snowden – Cognitive Edge (@snowded)

Charles Jennings – performance.learning.productivity (@charlesjennings)

Clark Quinn – Quinnovation (@quinnovator)

John Seely Brown John Seely Brown (@jseelybrown)

Also, check out the #km hashtag on Twitter for links to more useful content on knowledge management and learning.]

So, why the attack on social learning? I feel like I’m seeing this same pattern emerging with Design Thinking Snake Oil, and it’s frustrating to see a good thing so badly abused. Companies seem to want to implement a quick and easy solution that will solve their organizational issues, not realizing that what’s needed is not a patch for a faulty system, but rather a new system. Banking on the power of buzzwords only puts money into the pockets of consultants and marketers. At the end of the day, you’re out a couple grand, and your organization is still in trouble. These words are just the packaging – the underlying solution is a shift in culture and thinking.

Facilitating collaborative learning doesn’t have to be overcomplicated. Trying to formalize informal learning misses the point. When it comes down to it, we want to create environments that allow people to grow. There has been plenty of research linking learning with improvements in workplace performance, productivity, loyalty, and happiness.

Why?

I was reminded of the premise Daniel Pink put forward in his new book, Drive. Based on several decades of scientific research, he identifies three elements of human motivation: autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Not surprisingly, these things are all tied to learning – from learning how to make informed decisions, to honing skills and working towards expertise, to discovering and developing inherent strengths and talents. People want to grow. People want to feel remarkable. And people want to participate in behavior that both enhance themselves and their networks. We like to share.

I decided to do some ethnographic research on this topic and asked you on Twitter: “Why do you share?” The responses are below, and show how very human we are.

Pay attention, Enterprise. Social learning isn’t something you have to gnash your teeth over and figure out how to “enforce.” Learning literally makes the soul rejoice. Set up the environment, encourage the culture, and watch what will happen.

#

@jeff_dickey Why share? So people learn, and other people learn that not everybody is happy to go along with the status quo.

@SemiraSK “shared joy doubles joy” as the Germans say :))

@KathyHerrmann Sharing = Connecting, companionship, discovery, extending, excitement, richer experience.

@jankoch The short answer is love

@petertwo I share because … others may obtain value … it is a natural act (aka @WestPeter)

@Cekent I share in order to receive what others share. For me it is reciprocity, not sharing.

@cole_tucker i #share because it connects me with others and brings forth more from each of us

@AndreaMeyer it’s fun &rewarding 2 share info that’s useful 2 others; engage w/ new folks worldwide, learn new things, laugh, build future

@fadereu “We’ll transmit in order to receive.” – Nikola Tesla

@renatalemos there´s such a joy in discovering, that sharing this joy becomes part of its excitement

@ScottLeamon Sharing is almost instinctual. What I find is more curious why some do not share.

@Tomgibbonstms It is an expression of identity which I think is the purpose of all behaviour…

@jwolfworks Share? to: expand the commons, connect others to valued ideas, become acquainted, inspire, help cream rise, reveal my thinking- then receive

@MarkTamis to hone my ideas thru exchange

@sanchezjb A belief that the information shared may help or benefit someone and in turn, may help make a difference somewhere, someway.

@chris23 All psychological speculation aside, I am simply compelled to share. This, to me, is a deep & natural instinct.

@Strng_Dichotomy we share w others 2 provide level of confidence that our work will b treated w respect. sharing and relationship are coupled

@jazzmann91 I share so that I don’t become completely invisible… 🙂

@DanielStocker for feedback and to give back

@bioZhena Trying to connect with those who need what we have, and with those we need to get our tech to market

@AmandaClay I share because I can’t help it. I need to distribute good information to people who might want it. I’m a librarian.

@HowToMakeMyBlog it just feels good to share good and educating material to other people, why keep it secret?

@ehooge A first question should be: what do I share? As I like to share things that sharing increases ie: knowledge, love, happiness

Are We Becoming Our Own Puppetmasters?

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 31 Comments

Tags

Social Media

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

What do our online personas do to our physical-world identities? As we invest more time into developing our digital selves, is something taken away from who we are? Or something added? If you’re reading this, you spend some portion of your life online, and probably maintain an online identity or two across the various social networks. How does the creation and maintenance of those identities change your physical experience of self?

I’m curious if our participation in social networks, and specifically in creating our online identities, is creating an opportunity for us to lose our agency. We seem to relish the ability to carve out of online personalities and post an unlimited amount of information about ourselves, thinking that it is in some way a declaration of our existence and importance. I wonder if it has the opposite effect. Companies are profiting off of selling the data that we so willingly produce for free, reducing us down to not much more than commodities. And we are quick to defend our personas as legitimate extensions of ourselves, engaged in meaningful interactions that take up an increasingly greater portion of our time, energy and attention. Are we drinking our own Kool-Aid? Continue reading →

What is an expert?

25 Thursday Feb 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 73 Comments

Tags

culture

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

In the last post, we talked about a visualization tool that would allow us to tag ourselves and each other, and how that could be helpful for locating talent and sparking innovation. There have been great comments and ideas, and I want to continue that conversation in the next post. In the meantime, the concept of ‘expert‘ has been on my mind.

As I thought about the potential pitfalls of self-tagging, I couldn’t help but remember that article on mashable from December – There are 15,740 Social Media Experts on Twitter and wondered how we’ll get around this problem in the future.

Calling yourself an expert doesn’t make you one. Continue reading →

Tapping the Network to Facilitate Innovation

21 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 80 Comments

Tags

Design

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

A few weeks ago, I noticed a contest on Stowe Boyd’s site to receive a free entry to the Social Business Edge conference coming up in April in NYC, and a chance to share the idea on stage. I just found out my entry is one of four that was selected. I’m copying it here, but I’d love to build it out with you:

How can the power and scope of social networks, combined with a human capital inventory, be used to facilitate shared creation and innovation?

It wasn’t that long ago that society was a byproduct of an industrial era, characterized by assembly lines, processes, and efficiency. Like the machines they operated, people were not expected to think, but to conform and become a cog – a replicable, interchangeable part of a machine. The problem is, humans weren’t designed for mechanization. We were designed to create.

With the rise of social tools, we’ve been publicly reclaiming ourselves – publishing blogs, joining social networks, and connecting and sharing information with each other on a global scale. As a result, a shift in values is underway, where privacy, gatekeeping, and the preference for information silos is being replaced with new expectations of publicy, openness and transparency. We’re still exploring the implications of this transition both for our personal identities and for the role of the business organization, but there’s the potential to redesign the system in a way that’s fair, participatory, and human.

But how? Continue reading →

The Importance of Managing Your Online Reputation

06 Saturday Feb 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 63 Comments

Tags

reputation

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Last week during #journchat, I saw a reference to a post titled Does Your Twitter Handle Belong on Your Resume? The author is a PR college student, and the conversation around the post is mainly tactical, but the bigger picture surrounding our online identities is one I’ve been wanting to address for some time, so this gives me the opportunity. I’ll briefly cover some basic points about the nature of online space, but then I want to dig into the opportunities that are available in a networked culture.

#1. The Web is made up of mediated publics.

I think the first time I heard the term “mediated publics” was in a paper written by danah boyd while she was still a PhD candidate. In it, she described social networks as a type of public space, but with four unique properties:

  • Persistence – What you say sticks around. This is great for asynchronous communication, but it also means that what you said at 15 is still accessible when you are 30 and have purportedly outgrown those childish days.
  • Searchability – My mother would’ve loved the ability to scream “Find!” into the ether and determine where I was hanging out with my friends. She couldn’t, and I’m thankful. Today’s teens’ parents have found their hangouts with the flick of a few keystrokes.
  • Replicability – Digital bits are copyable; this means that you can copy a conversation from one place and paste it into another place. It also means that it’s difficult to determine if the content was doctored.
  • Invisible audiences – While it is common to face strangers in public life, our eyes provide a good sense of who can overhear our expressions. In mediated publics, not only are lurkers invisible, but persistence, searchability, and replicability introduce audiences that were never present at the time when the expression was created.

A quick review of these characteristics serve as a good reminder that what you do/say/post online is effectively being done in public. When framed in this context, the results of much of the research being done around managing online information seem expected. For instance, take a look at this chart, taken from ‘Recruiters really care about your online reputation even if you don’t.’  The top five reasons mentioned here to reject a candidate for recruitment are things that would be equally inappropriate if done directly in front of that potential employer. Continue reading →

iPad: Overhyped Flop or a case of Great Design Thinking?

01 Monday Feb 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 161 Comments

Tags

technology

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

I’ve quietly been watching all the opinions about the potential impact of the iPad over the past few days, and want to provide a roundup of perspectives. Though my initial reaction was lukewarm, (I believe my tweet was “iWasExpectingToBeMoreImpressed”), I decided that that reaction was completely ignorant. So, after spending some time *thinking* instead of just reacting, an interesting picture is beginning to form. Let’s take a look. Oh, and if you haven’t seen the keynote address or the video released by Apple, you can watch it here.

Naysayers

Many of the thoughts about the iPad are focused around what it’s missing, namely Flash, USB, camera, and multitasking. There are also heated arguments about it being a closed system that will kill creativity. I want to share some views around the web addressing these points:

I checked out a post over on Scoble’s blog, “Can Flash Be Saved?“, to get a sense of the conversation around this one. I found this in the comments section:

Steve Jobs is a genius in deciding which technologies are obsolete and thus should be discarded. He did this first with Floppies (and now the world has no floppies). He did this with serial ports and SCSI ports (and how we have USB). He is now doing the same with Flash. Thus, I predict Flash will be dead to the rest of the world soon. When Google has its HTML-5 YouTube up and running, then there will be no reason for using Flash on YouTube. Continue reading →

a blogger’s questionnaire: some thoughts about process

30 Saturday Jan 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

interview

6TU2ZSFSWFKD

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

I was approached recently by Design Feast, a blog described as “a go-to resource for students, professionals, educators and the design-curious—delivering relevant and diverse design content, creative voices and projects” to contribute some thoughts about the hows and why of blogging. Below are my responses, originally posted here.

Venessa Miemis describes herself as a “Futurist” and “Metacog.” She is an avid reader, from The Age of Spiritual Machines to her latest indulgence in complexity science. Adjacent to her reading appetite, she practices her hobby of picking up new hobbies like yoga and gardening, even beer brewing. She also takes full advantage of the highly diverse cultural scene of New York City. One of her pursuits is a Masters in Media Studies at the New School which shares space with Parsons. I discovered Venessa and her blog Emergent by Design via@designthinkers. It is where I discovered her insightful post about design thinking. Her blogging reflects her holistic attitude and practice, and her sustained web-based publishing experience may help your entrance into the blogosphere or further inform your current work in it:

Why did you create a web site of regular entries?

I had a lot of ideas swirling around in my head, and got really frustrated when I couldn’t articulate them to people in conversation. The process of putting it down on paper and figuring out how to communicate in a clear, simple manner has been incredibly helpful in understanding what it is I’m actually trying to say. It’s also intrinsically rewarding to have people come to the site and engage with the ideas presented there. Continue reading →

why monetizing twitter [with ads] won’t work

27 Wednesday Jan 2010

Posted by Venessa Miemis in Uncategorized

≈ 23 Comments

Tags

Social Media

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Maybe it was sparked by a new course I’m taking on digital media strategy, or some recent data on Twitter users and engagement,  but it got me to thinking about the big question of how Twitter is going to make money. I’ve come to the conclusion that advertising simply won’t work. Two reasons:

#1 – the domain where conversations happen is sacred

OK, ‘sacred’ might be a bit mystical, but think about it – we’re social creatures, and we’re practicing our fullest expression of being human when we’re engaging with others. Whether it’s exchanging tips, ideas, or gossip, the ability to share ourselves with another person is what being alive is all about. People refuse to have their space violated at that most fundamental level – where conversations happen – and the current online version of that space is Twitter. Continue reading →

← Older posts
Newer posts →

abundance anti-rivalrous authority biohacking books cognitive enhancement collaboration commerce communication community consciousness consciousness & evolution consciousness hacking creativity creativity + design culture currency decor Design digital literacy ello entheogens ethics evolution flow futures innovation interview microdosing money money + currency neurohacker collective neurohacking neuroscience neurotech nootropics personal development philosophy projects psychedelics psychotherapy reputation Resources response-ability scarcity self smart drugs social evolution social innovation Social Media social organization society sovereignty style sustainability technology technology + society Trends Video vision willpower women Work workshop

Archives

Blog Stats

  • 1,124,740 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,179 other subscribers

Top Posts

  • A Step-by-Step Guide to Tribal Leadership: Part 1: The Five Stages of Tribal Culture
  • 3 Tools for Futures Thinking & Foresight Development
  • What is Design Thinking, Really?
  • Towards a Distributed Internet
  • An Idea Worth Spreading: The Future is Networks

Recent Posts

  • What it Means to Be A Neurohacker
  • Using Psychedelics to Increase Performance and Reprogram the Mind/Brain Interface
  • Why the World Needs Neurohacking Now
  • The Neurohacker’s Toolbox: Nootropics
  • What is Neurohacking?
  • when the mind hijacks my flow state
  • what mental slavery looks like: repressive & reactive patterns
  • Constructing the New Narrative
  • i am a consciousness with a society of personalities
  • on the forcing of willpower & the art of relaxation

@venessamiemis

Tweets by venessamiemis

Emergent by Design

Emergent by Design

Recent Comments

Venessa Miemis's avatarVenessa Miemis on Why the World Needs Neurohacki…
Monica Anderson's avatarMonica Anderson on Why the World Needs Neurohacki…
Venessa Miemis's avatarVenessa Miemis on The Neurohacker’s Toolbo…
bonnittaroy's avatarbonnittaroy on The Neurohacker’s Toolbo…
What is Neurohacking… on What is Neurohacking?
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  • RSS - Posts

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • emergent by design
    • Join 1,179 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • emergent by design
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...